Tuesday, January 26, 2016

The MOST sued Sheriff in America Tom Dart - SUED AGAIN! The liberal bleeding heart Sheriff Tom Dart UNTIL it's on property he controls - CHICAGO BEGGARS SUE OVER LOST WAGES KICKED OFF CHICAGO DALEY CENTER PROPERTY FILE FEDERAL LAWSUIT

IT WAS LIKE THE OLD DAYS BEING HERE AGAIN! COOK COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICERS CHASING OUT POOR BLACK PEOPLE FOR ASKING FOR CHANGE!


Two panhandlers in Chicago sued their local sheriff’s department in civil court, saying the deputies unfairly booted them from their so-called place of work in the city’s popular square, causing them to lose hundreds of dollars of expected wages.

The case focuses on the constitutional right of freedom of speech, rather than on money.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!

Kim Pindak and Sam Phillips, both beggars, said they lost about $10 per day over the course of four years due to Cook County sheriff’s deputies who ordered them to stop asking for money at Daley Plaza, the Associated Press reported. If the plaintiffs win, they could be awarded thousands of dollars to make up for these lost dollars.

“A lot of people see us as scam artists,” Pindak, 63, said, AP reported. “I don’t live in the Waldorf Astoria. I’m just trying to survive.”

“The Death of Free Speech: How Our Broken National Dialogue Has Killed the Truth and Divided America” examines how the news media has created arbitrary, biased and illogical rules for determining what can and cannot be said in the public arena.

He said he had to beg in order to supplement his $750-per-month tax-paid disability payments because his assisted living facility took all but $30 of that amount.

Rebecca Glenberg, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois, said jurisdictions around the nation have been clamping down on what she said was an individual’s right to ask for money – a First Amendment free-speech matter – for the last few years. And Adele Nicholas, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, argued to the court that law enforcement agencies have a responsibility to properly train their officers about citizens’ constitutional rights.

“This case is about something bigger” than money, she said, AP reported. “It’s about responsible police practices.”

Judge Andrew P. Napolitano’s “The Freedom Answer Book” provides a clear vision of what your rights are and how you can protect them. Get your copy of this helpful guide to the Constitution today!

The attorney for the sheriff’s department, meanwhile, said the plaintiffs weren’t arrested or detained and therefore, didn’t suffer any damages.

The city has an ordinance that bans aggressive panhandling. But the plaintiffs say they aren’t aggressive; rather, they say they simply hold signs saying they’re hungry.

0 comments: